Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Need Wood truss engineer for Nevada 23

Status
Not open for further replies.

jepps3

Structural
Aug 15, 2023
43
Hello. I’m looking for engineered flat roof wood truss design for a single family home in Nevada.

I know truss manufacturers can provide this, but I don’t want them to design. I would like to get the design drawings independently and then send out to manufacture.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Be patient, therefore, brothers, until the coming of RonTheRedneck. See how the all engineers wait for the precious fruit of bud designs, being patient about it, until it receives the early and the late rains.
 
With proper design, both web bracing can work. The second approach results in larger but fewer TPIC plates, and does not accommodate uplift very well. The first approach is more common to the industry, and I suspect is likely less costly to fabricate, else the second approach would be common. The first approach is better for 'added' loading and the lighter member loads may make it less prone to failure.

The comment about the depth to span is good... I'd expect a deeper section, even for steel construction.

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
Residential truss design is so driven towards lowest price. One commercial project we were involved in the GC selected the lowest price from a number of suppliers. They had two lifts of T braces and other bracing to install on site that was not part of their package. Along with that they had some "Site Frame" regions that were not included. They have looked at quotes much closer ever since then.
 
It’s fairly simple:

The truss #1 attachment is a design created by Simpson CS Studio software.

Truss #2 design was hand made be RonTheRedneck, who has proven to show distinct qualities of legit engineering practices. Let us not be cruel to those who perform good work with honorable hands.
 
My questions were cruel? [ponder]
I designed a lot of trusses, albiet a long time ago. What was said here went against my take aways from that. We preferred deeper trusses for deflection control. I had questions. Still didn't get very satisfying answers, but now I'd just rater just let it go. Just not worth ruffling any more feathers.

Don't get into petroleum project development.
Even Angles have to carry 3 or 4 extra sets of wings.

--Einstein gave the same test to students every year. When asked why he would do something like that, "Because the answers had changed."
 
1503-44 - As it is, RonTheRedneck shall rejoice, not because you were grieved, but because you were grieved into believing his design integrity. For you felt a sudden grief, so that you suffered no loss through presenting technical inspections on fellow engineers. But your feelings inside actually produces a forgiveness that leads to salvation without regret, whereas judgemental criticism produces sadness.
 
jepps3 said:
Truss #2 design was hand made be RonTheRedneck, who has proven to show distinct qualities of legit engineering practices.

Now that's funny! I think I'll wait for Ron to explain why, though.
 
@bridgesmith - you gotta admit, RonTheRedneck does fully demonstrate some good ol’ american ingenuity. I believe that people, such as him, have led the way for future generations to be inspired to design REAL WORLD solutions that meet standards and quality that consumers demand.

In the end, even BridgeSmith felt invigorated by RonTheRedneck’s tenacity for clever mindset that puts exciting recommendations on the table.
 
In the end, even BridgeSmith felt invigorated by RonTheRedneck’s tenacity for clever mindset that puts exciting recommendations on the table.

You think so, huh?
 
I'm beginning to see why you were quoted $27,000 for your trusses..... [bigsmile]

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
27000 worth of billable hours were uselessly spent on this thread alone :)

Just to add something - coming from petroleum/powergeneration background - i cant imagine ever using a truss requering web bracing - didnt know such a thing existed until now :)
 
But it has been kind of fun to don once in a while. Most threads get between 5 and 10 posts - this one has over 100!!

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
It has been entertaining, at least. Especially the assumptions about RontheRedneck's design process and "engineering practices". That cracked me up.
 
Listen here guys! From all of us at Eng-Tips.com, we would like to announce that it is our pleasure to bring entertainment to the engineering community.

If it were up to me, all of you deserve $27,000 for design work. I applaud all of the dedicated individuals here that provide a unique insight into today’s engineer.

I’m honored to be in a room full of alpha men who bring the “business” to the industry.
 
I try not to make assumptions. Trust, but verify. I ask questions.

What can you do when 1.5" is always the weak axis dimension, except brace. Not much to work with.

--Einstein gave the same test to students every year. When asked why he would do something like that, "Because the answers had changed."
 
@littleinch - in the spirit of a little comedy, you know dang well that your Username “LittleInch” combined with the category “Petroleum” is wide open for entertaining content. Hahahahaha, just kidding!!
 
It gets better. It's not his fault, but you'd have to had been hanging around this site for quite a long time to know that story.

--Einstein gave the same test to students every year. When asked why he would do something like that, "Because the answers had changed."
 
Time to close this thread out I think.

Until something new happens.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 

1503-44 - You didn't ask how much deflection the truss had. You asked if I checked deflections. That's what put me off.

Deflection checks are built into the software in order to make it as idiot-proof as possible. The program has minimum limits. We can raise them, but can't lower them. I have enough experience to know when deflection is going to be a problem. (Subject for another thread)


Some of you have said some kind things in this thread. I appreciate that.


Someone emntioned truss manufacturers being "cheap". (Not the exact words)

Surely you guys know why. Several of you have mentioned that you work on thin margins. We do too.

I've tried to sell jobs based on service and quality. I'll bet many of you have too. And I've been told to my face that service and quality are great - As long as we're the low bidder. I'd also bet many of you have heard similar things from your customers.

 
@RonTheRedneck - AMEN Brotha....preach baby, preach!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor