Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Dual Flatness callouts on ISO GPS

Status
Not open for further replies.

SeasonLee

Mechanical
Sep 15, 2008
909
Please ref to the section view below:
cid_image001_png_01D6AE0A_abbe4z.png


Its an ISO spec, I havn't seen dual flatness callouts before, what is the meaning of each callout?
Thanks for the help.

Season
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Looks like the larger flatness tolerance callout is specified with the circled F modifier which I think means the same thing as in ASME - the requirement is for the free state condition. That suggests that the smaller flatness tolerance is for the restrained condition.
 
Thanks, Burunduk.

For the Free State modifier, are there any differences between ASME GD&T and ISO GPS?

Season
 
I just know that ISO 10579 is the ISO standard which defines free state modifier.
I don't think there is a big difference between ASME and ISO on this aspect, maybe just some subtle differences which I am not aware about.



 
Just checked the ISO standard, according to the examples from ISO 10579 Annex A (shown below), it seems some errors on my first posted figure, the dual flatness callouts with individual flatness symbol while the example on ISO standard sharing a single flatness symbol. A lot I need to know and learn from GPS.
2020-10-30_110410_fcufos.jpg


Season
 
SeasonLee said:
Just checked the ISO standard, according to the examples from ISO 10579 Annex A (shown below), it seems some errors on my first posted figure, the dual flatness callouts with individual flatness symbol while the example on ISO standard sharing a single flatness symbol. A lot I need to know and learn from GPS.
It's not a mistake, it can be used both ways.

Single symbol can be used also on Position or Profile tolerance for example, but then the reader should be extra careful to which standard is it. If ASME that would be a composite, ISO doesn't have composite callouts.
So in ISO is the same if there is a single symbol or multiple.
 
cr7 said:
It's not a mistake, it can be used both ways.

Thanks for your information, may I ask any documents to support it.

Season
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor