It isn't really thick enough to warrant a double-v prep from the start. In my opinion keep the single-v, deposit your root and hot pass, go back inside and backgouge the square edge back to your original root and dress it up to the same V prep angle. VT/MT back gouged/ground surface. Deposit...
At that point 'not good enough' would result in the TPI getting a beat down.
Ask him to provide you WHAT information would satisfy him THEN ask him to reference some or any tolerances for a tank built via this method. It's not black and white. At the end like previously stated the final result...
Its utilized in the fabrication to control out of line plates via periodic sweep / band checks.
If you're doing this in service you're better off contacting a survey crew to give you a shell readout where you can see the out of round.
At the end of the day even if it is out by certain...
You're replacing an entire floor and didn't anticipate having foundation rework in the process? Possibly some added drainage?
If not, then it's obvious that the remnants of rust scale and possibly contaminated ones aren't a major concern. But.. id take it out. It's a shame to go through that...
Never put them too close to the edge. You will get some deformed whatever-NPT hole after the welding is complete and the repad sucks back to the curvature of the tank. Do what IFRs suggested. If the repad is split along the centerline offset your weepholes down/up 2"/6t off that weld centerline.
1. It is acceptable to perform shearwave UT on annular ring radial joints. Very common on existing annular ring repairs. Remember this is very operator dependent so get someone who knows what they are seeing or you'll be hurting.
2. In regards to the RT requirements as Samm17 mentioned it...
How thick is the manway neck? Is it one continuous rolled plate with a butt-welded long seam? Or is it an older 12c style with the two press-formed halves with one big circ-seam joining them?
Bimr hit the nail on the head with the first post. I actually started to reply about rolled plate, one long seam with two formed heads, combine nozzles into single repad, yada yada. Obviously this is for a hobby and doesn't follow code.
I've done it on built-up manways but I'm just curious why in this situation you are requested to fabricate a nozzle neck out of rolled plate. Its perfectly fine but in most cases some seamless A106B will suffice.
It's a corner weld, meaning its a single process from one side and you need to qualify your guy for that shell thickness which is easy to do at a 1/2" test. Should be good to backgouge and fill the remainder up with a heavy wall ticket.
There is already a much better way to achieve this connection of yours that was already hinted at with the appropriate internal bevel that is easy to achieve and butt weld-out/xray/mag do what you need to do. Ditch the threaded plugs altogether like 11echo mentioned. They are always weak points...
Requirements for material traceability are not specified in the code other than every material must be identified and if it cannot be... to follow Appendix N and Purchaser specifications/requirements.
Due to this plate being for cold service hence the impact requirements (350WT) this makes...
Duwe6,
With your UT experience if you had a similar corner joint as seen in the above 'Detail 4'.. but with a full-penetration weld throughout the insert and repad thickness; Is this something a competent level II UT could handle in a shop environment or would you be leaning more towards PAUT...
