Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could you point us to what photo or video you see this in? It doesn't look that way in the frame-by-frame posted by INCENTIVE 24 Mar 18 01:34 (Part IV)TheGreenLama said:the fact that member 10 is seen punching through the bottom slab
TheGreenLama said:can we deduce anything about when 11-12 base area disintegrates,
gwideman said:Could you point us to what photo or video you see this in? It doesn't look that way in the frame-by-frame posted by INCENTIVE 24 Mar 18 01:34 (Part IV)
TheGreenLama said:Took a while to find, but it's in Thread I, Tomfh 18 Mar 2:49, within the blown up version. When I compare this to the latest noted above by Jrs87 27 Mar 8:27, they appear to differ in that zone of the bridge. Can't explain why. Now I'm not sure what to believe!
RCPete said:I'm new to the forum, but have been following from the beginning. I see a bulge at the 11/10 intersection below the deck, but I'm fairly sure it's an illusion.
In thread 4, gwideman's photo in the 24 Mar 18 12:37 you can see the traffic signals in the eastbound lanes in the distance.
A clearer view of the signals is in INCENTIVE's post at Mar 18 01:34. You can make out the bottoms of the westbound signals and signs below the deck. It looks like one of these signals was just behind the 10-11 junction in the Tomfh photogram at the time of the collapse.
TheGreenLama said:If you run Gwideman's video, the "possible" punching of 10 through bottom slab occurs AFTER the falling bridge has passed before the traffic signals in question.
gwideman said:I have never been clear whether there are one or two
saikee119 (Structural) said:Sound like a Chernobyl accident to me.