Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Norway bridge collapse 17

Status
Not open for further replies.
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

"It's Norway, after all. What else could you expect?"

This is called ironic humor. By many. I had assumed that the cited characteristics were actually uncommon, and thus my comment would be humorous.

I was trying to get Retrograde to respond with some actual examples, and it was done as a prompt.

Of course, if Norway is indeed a hotbed of corruption and malfeasance, then it would perhaps be seen as a straight correct statement. That is a possibility I had not thought of, but apparently others view it as at least slightly possible.



spsalso
 
Here's another one that you can drive on.

Covered_bridg_gscd64.jpg


Of course, this one was built in 1962 and is a tourist attraction in the village of Frankenmuth, Michigan. The entire town is a tourist attraction set in a Bavarian theme, famous for, among other things, German cuisine, Christmas decorations, beer, and horrible traffic jams on weekends. We know about the traffic jams since this is where my wife and I lived our first year out of college. We always loved coming to Frankenmuth and when I got a job in Saginaw, just about a 12-mile drive to work, we decided to rent an apartment there and see if perhaps we'd like to stay in the area. That's when we learned that it's a lot different living IN a tourist attraction than coming to visit once in a while. After a year, we moved into Saginaw where both of us were closer to our jobs and away from the total weekend gridlock. We still occasionally stop and visit when we're in Michigan, but I would never live there again.

John R. Baker, P.E. (ret)
Irvine, CA
Siemens PLM:
UG/NX Museum:

The secret of life is not finding someone to live with
It's finding someone you can't live without
 
Here's a nice shot of the wood railroad bridge I linked to, earlier:

304af1df61ca5894bddd7e2211890e00_imvhbu.jpg


It's a working railroad bridge, at least in 2019. It was built in 1936 as a replacement for a flood damaged one. Of the three spans of this bridge, it is the newest.

It is NOT a covered bridge.



spsalso
 
Model of Tretten bridge using drawings from pdf posted earlier. Approx 2m slope down to the west, lower chord is straight line, upper chord scaled from drawing. I'm using one unit of load at each lower chord node and twenty units at node 17. I don't have any control of the output. Blue is tension, red is compression.

Truss_Load_17_slzgeh.jpg
 
I noted that you did not volunteer any of those examples. I was trying to prod you to do so.

If you care to give such examples, I am sure you will.


spsalso
 
Sym P. le,

Would you please run that same program with a nice handsome loading about where the loaded track was, at the time?


spsalso
 
The collapse was likely due to one of three items. The timber structure had deteriorated, or the bridge was underdesigned, or the bridge was overloaded. We need additonal information in order to comment. Timber bridges can be designed to accommodate significant loads. I doubt that the ends were capped, but copper is a good choice due to it's antifungal properties. Capping can trap moisture... the bane of wood construction. I was involved in a project about 50 years back that used a timber treatment called the Boliden treatment. The architect was from Iceland and it was a common preservative back then and was excellent. I'd never heard of it back then... and, I don't think I've heard of it since.

So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
Deteriorated. In 10 years.

IN 10 YEARS!

Yikes!

If someone believes that could happen, they really should explain why. Then they could continue and explain why the design team didn't account for it.




spsalso
 
News article said:
There has been a kind of rocking in the bridge recently, which has not been there before.

Something changed. I.e. something broke and the parts that tried to compensate weren't happy.
 
Some pure speculation on my part. Both abutments seem to be capable of resisting a large horizonal force. Therefore, the bridge may have tried to act as an arch rather than as a truss. The arch forces would have been reasonably constant over the length of the top chord. The part of the top chord without the lateral truss, at each end, could have developed stability issues, buckling laterally.
 
You do wonder if the new two pile supports settled a a bit compared to the stone supports which were part of the original bridge.

It's also interesting that the longitudinal members of the road deck itself also appear to be timber.

And that the road is offset from the centre of the bridge. You have a two lane road then a cycle / pedestrian section within the bridge.

This offset loading can't be good and maybe isn't recognised in the design calcs?

Note also the timber joint in this photo which is one bay inland from the new two pile support.

bridge12_txc7m4.jpg


bridge13_wjewym.jpg






Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
 
The study cited by Sym P Ie noted a bridge failure in 2016. The report suggests the design of the "Perkolo bridge at Sjoa," is similar to this bridge, but looking at the pictures it seems the similarity is limited to a truss and wood elements. In that failure one researcher noted over reliance on complex modeling.

trenton-study_hjvvds.png
 
There is a construction joint at node 16 (see model above) and I'm thinking there is also one at node 15 on the lower chord. That would be my focus. Note the upper chord snapped at node 14. That took a lot of force and something close by had to give way to cause it.
 
Here is a nice picture showing the side of the failed bridge where the large load was applied when it fell:



1660815464_18aug22-norwaybridge_upgteu.jpg



I note that the two support posts are not parallel at this time.

Here's another nice one:



2a874b234b_gkv6h3.jpg




spsalso
 
Frequently, a moving load will have time to move away from the destruction it caused. In this case, we find significant issues behind the lorry, not in front of it. That's why I moved away from the east end of the structure after a cursory review. The modeling didn't show anything worth being excited about at the east end either.
 
This bridge may become a prime example where old skool principles are foo-fooed for esthetics because we have computers and know too much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor