LittleInch
Petroleum
- Mar 27, 2013
- 21,637
This report has just surfaced
Basically the load sheet allocated a childs weight to everyone listed as "Miss" instead of an a adult weight for everyone with "Ms". Apparently caused by a revised IT program in an unnamed other country where miss is commonly used for children.
Now something the size of a 737 it may not have been a huge issue, but I'm sure I recall a smaller commuter plane of 20-25 people which stalled on take off and when they recalculated all the Actual weights of the passengers the plane was over weight. US airways flight 5481 -
Other things contributed more to that crash, but overweight without realising it was a major contributory cause.
So maybe not an engineering disaster, but a near miss and is a reminder than generic assumptions still need to be checked against your specific design or operation.
Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.
Basically the load sheet allocated a childs weight to everyone listed as "Miss" instead of an a adult weight for everyone with "Ms". Apparently caused by a revised IT program in an unnamed other country where miss is commonly used for children.
Now something the size of a 737 it may not have been a huge issue, but I'm sure I recall a smaller commuter plane of 20-25 people which stalled on take off and when they recalculated all the Actual weights of the passengers the plane was over weight. US airways flight 5481 -
Other things contributed more to that crash, but overweight without realising it was a major contributory cause.
So maybe not an engineering disaster, but a near miss and is a reminder than generic assumptions still need to be checked against your specific design or operation.
Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.